Reaching the rural poor through rural producer organizations? A study of agricultural marketing cooperatives in Ethiopia

This paper examines the notion of inclusiveness in rural producer organizations (RPOs) and therefore the extent to that such RPOs is accustomed reach the agricultural poor in geographic region. mistreatment farmer cooperatives in African country as a case in purpose, the paper examines the role of RPOs in supporting farmer development, and therefore the extent to that principles of associate degree inclusive , bottom-up approach relate to their promoting performance. supported a mixture of nationally-representative household- and cooperative-level survey information, we discover that poorer farmers tend to not participate in these organizations though they’ll indirectly have the benefit of them. once they do participate, they’re typically excluded from decision-making processes. Finally, we tend to investigate the connection between promoting performance and inclusiveness and uncover proof of great tradeoffs between them. [1]

Agricultural marketing and peasant‐state transfers in Tanzania

The paper examines the approach within which the agricultural selling system acted as a mechanism for transferring resources out of the agricultural economy in African country over the amount 1970 to 1980. Trends within the relationship between producer costs associate degreed sales prices of marketed crops are analysed to get an estimate of gross resource transfers from peasants to the state. The analysis conjointly identifies the foremost forces, each internal and external to state selling establishments, that resulted in an exceedingly deterioration within the economic potency of agricultural selling and a concomitant steep decline in real returns to marketed agricultural production. [2]

Performance Measurement of the Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives: The Gap between Theory and Practice

The performance of agricultural cooperatives depends on their business objectives, that are outlined in numerous ways that within the literature. we have a tendency to review the theoretical literature on the performance of agricultural selling cooperatives. Studies may be divided into 2 categories, people who assume one objective and people that assume multiple objectives. This classification integrates 3 views of the cooperatives: (a) consolidation of corporations, (b) freelance enterprise, and (c) coalition of corporations. Empirical studies on the monetary performance of cooperatives are classified into 2 classes, studies supported the theory of the firm and studies that emphasize accounting techniques. Empirical studies have did not address the cooperatives’ objectives as delineate by the theoretical literature on cooperative performance. [3]

Research Under the Agricultural Marketing Boards

IN a written reply to a matter by Sir Arnold Wilson within the House of Commons on what extent the powers presented by each Agricultural selling Acts to adopt schemes for analysis in the production and marketing of agricultural merchandise are exercised by the Potato, Bacon, Milk, Pigs, and Hops selling Boards, Mr. music director Elliot, Minister of Agriculture, stated: “The Hops selling Board doesn’t possess any powers of the sort cited. the opposite Agricultural selling Boards mentioned have sure powers that they will exercise in reference to analysis services, however I perceive they need not nevertheless exercised them.” Mr. Elliot aforementioned he had little doubt that the Boards in question can provide attention to the question of analysis at the earliest potential chance, which they’re going to approach the Ministry of Agriculure ought to they assume the Ministry ready to assist them. [4]

Benefits and Perception of Dry Chilli Farmers in Online Marketing: Experiences from Karnataka State, India

In recent years e-commerce has found its means in agricultural sector in Bharat, in line with different sectors, agricultural businesses have obsessed e-marketing, or web promoting. For implementation of agricultural promoting policy to bring associate potency and transparency within the agricultural marketing system for economical worth discovery to learn farmers, the initiation was taken by Government of Mysore and also the NCDEX Spot Exchange restricted during this direction.Unified promoting Platform (UMP) associate initiative by the state govt. launched in 2014 by the Rashtriya e-Market Services (ReMs). this study tries to assess the advantages and perception of farmers in on-line promoting of dry chili in Hubballi and Byadgi regulated markets, concerning sixty on-line dry chili farmers and 60 ancient farmers were selected . The descriptive statistics wont to analyze the info. Total returns obtained by ancient farmers with Rs.30,585/acre and relatively but on-line farmers was Rs.34,525/acre. proportion worth of commodities across marketsin on-line promoting was over ancient marketing price. In on-line promoting the infrastructures like ton entry, adequacy and time worth info, wider market space, higher worth and SMS alert were adequate, gate entry, storage, computers, e-payment were part adequate. Grading and cold storage were inadequate. most variety of ancient farmers most popular progressive farmers for market information followed by friends as supply of knowledge. on-line farmers were used portable as major supply of knowledge followed by newspaper. Majority of on-line farmers were concerned in grading and got SMS registration, got remunerative worth. only a few of ancient farmers had data concerning banking, SMS registration and grading. Infrastructure for post-harvest management must be strengthening primary level on public-private partnership mode. there’s have to produce awareness concerning on-line promoting through coaching, campaigns and different extension activities to farmers. [5]


[1] Bernard, T. and Spielman, D.J., 2009. Reaching the rural poor through rural producer organizations? A study of agricultural marketing cooperatives in Ethiopia. Food policy, 34(1), pp.60-69. (Web Link)

[2] Ellis, F., 1983. Agricultural marketing and peasant‐state transfers in Tanzania. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 10(4), pp.214-242. (Web Link)

[3] Soboh, R.A., Lansink, A.O., Giesen, G. and Van Dijk, G., 2009. Performance measurement of the agricultural marketing cooperatives: the gap between theory and practice. Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(3), pp.446-469. (Web Link)

[4] Research Under the Agricultural Marketing Boards

Naturevolume 133, page444 (1934) (Web Link)

[5] Pavithra, K. and Nayak, M. R. (2018) “Benefits and Perception of Dry Chilli Farmers in Online Marketing: Experiences from Karnataka State, India”, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 28(4), pp. 1-9. doi: 10.9734/AJAEES/2018/45760. (Web Link)


Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *