The purpose concerning this paper is to improve on the critics of delegation and decomposition in abducting authority and supporting Ubuntu philosophy in Social Welfare Organisations in Zimbabwe. In abdicating authority and supporting Ubuntu Philosophy, the systematic disposal of authority by top administration in social welfare organisations remains a quarrelsome issue. Delegating responsibility while abdicating respect and human nobility is a critical issue in social welfare organisations, as few community-located organisations fail to consider the hereditary worth of attendants before undertaking projects and appointing tasks. In governmental parastatals participatory democratic principles are not effectively achieved when delegating duties, the top administration restricts itself to important decisions districts like policy making, coordination and control. The lower level managers have enough conclusion making authority and support to present innovativeness in their work. Data collection systems that were used contained observations, focus group discourse and interviews. The targeted populace included worldwide, statutory and non-statutory organisations in Zimbabwe. The study decided that delegation and decentralisation in social work organisations are criticised as a result of local beurocracy and inequalities that endure in organisations. Respondents stated that decentralisation is a meaningful hindrance in supporting organisational values and ethics. Some directors in social welfare organisations do not appreciate the basic need for basic respect and benevolence for other clerks, such as sharing accountable responsibility.
Tariro Portia Tendengu,
Zimbabwe Ezekiel Guti University, Bindura, Zimbabwe.
Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/RAASS-V3/article/view/8814
Keywords: Delegation, decentralization, authority, Ubuntu philosophy, Social Welfare Organisations